Evidence of Adverse Selection in Iranian Supplementary Health Insurance Market
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Existence or non-existence of adverse selection in insurance market is one of the important cases that have always been considered by insurers. Adverse selection is one of the consequences of asymmetric information. Theory of adverse selection states that high-risk individuals demand the insurance service more than low risk individuals do. METHODS The presence of adverse selection in Iran's supplementary health insurance market is tested in this paper. The study group consists of 420 practitioner individuals aged 20 to 59. We estimate two logistic regression models in order to determine the effect of individual's characteristics on decision to purchase health insurance coverage and loss occurrence. Using the correlation between claim occurrence and decision to purchase health insurance, the adverse selection problem in Iranian supplementary health insurance market is examined. RESULTS Individuals with higher level of education and income level purchase less supplementary health insurance and make fewer claims than others make and there is positive correlation between claim occurrence and decision to purchase supplementary health insurance. CONCLUSION Our findings prove the evidence of the presence of adverse selection in Iranian supplementary health insurance market.
منابع مشابه
The Effect of Supplementary Health Insurance on Out-of-Pocket Payments for Elderly Households in Urban Areas of Iran: Heckman Selection Model
Objectives: Considering the growth of the elderly population and the need of the elderly for health services and the importance of supplementary insurance on improving the quality of life of the elderly households, this study aimed to investigate the effect of supplementary health insurance on out-of-pocket payments for elderly households in urban areas of Iran. Methods: this descriptive-analy...
متن کاملBasic versus supplementary health insurance: Moral hazard and adverse selection ¬リニ
a r t i c l e i n f o JEL classification: I13 D82 H51 Keywords: Universal basic health insurance Voluntary supplementary insurance Public vs. private insurance Adverse selection Moral hazard Cost effectiveness This paper introduces a tractable model of health insurance with both moral hazard and adverse selection. We show that government sponsored universal basic insurance should cover treatmen...
متن کاملMinimum standards, insurance regulation and adverse selection: evidence from the Medigap market
This paper examines the implications of minimum standards for insurance markets. I study the imposition of binding minimum standards on the market for voluntary private health insurance for the elderly. The central estimates suggest that the introduction of the standards was associated with an 8 percentage point (25%) decrease in the proportion of the population with coverage in the affected ma...
متن کاملAsymmetric Information in Iranian's Health Insurance Market: Testing of Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard.
BACKGROUND Asymmetric information is one of the most important issues in insurance market which occurred due to inherent characteristics of one of the agents involved in insurance contracts; hence its management requires designing appropriate policies. This phenomenon can lead to the failure of insurance market via its two consequences, namely, adverse selection and moral hazard. OBJECTIVE Th...
متن کاملInsurer Pricing and Consumer Welfare: Evidence from Medigap∗
While adverse selection is often blamed for ineffi ciently high insurance premiums, imperfect competition is also a pervasive feature of many health insurance markets. In Medicare Supplement insurance (Medigap), two firms control nearly three-fourths of the market and premiums exceed claims by thirty percent. I find that while adverse selection can restrain markups, a low price elasticity and c...
متن کامل